From the wide range of possibilities that exist for managing a team, it seems that they consider only two, which are precisely those that are on the opposite side.
The paradigm that we have it, one hand on the club model, where the manager believes in the potential of your team, use their own resources and with adequate training and with the right coach, obtains some impressive results at a reasonable price. This is called faith in people.
At the other end, and apologize to the real fans (this was not color but managers) do have the model of team white, easy money, because they are basically of all, who buys the services of coaches and players, prices and a galactic ambition without enough solid foundation to build a project. The way they do is based on conflict, classism and contempt for others. In the end however, the results are mediocre and the cost dramatically.
are many aspects that differentiate the spirit of both teams is to make the game becomes philosophy, relationships, life in a nutshell. When you present the dilemmas involving the two philosophies, it seems impossible that anyone can opt for the latter, unless for incompetence, craving for power or money.
not, as some may prefer al'honestedat foul play, the conflict harmony, the
pride to humility, the team hierarchy, or rejection of the same admiration of others.
The analogy we make between the football world and the company, there is a difference between the two and that soccer is done every year clean slate and start from scratch, while the company begins each year where he finished last year.
the direction we believe that we all depend are part of a great team, which is exhibited as an example and envy of others, or we enter a downward spiral in which the disaffection empire and escape from "normal" people, finally playing in minor leagues.
Waters is more than a club?
The paradigm that we have it, one hand on the club model, where the manager believes in the potential of your team, use their own resources and with adequate training and with the right coach, obtains some impressive results at a reasonable price. This is called faith in people.
At the other end, and apologize to the real fans (this was not color but managers) do have the model of team white, easy money, because they are basically of all, who buys the services of coaches and players, prices and a galactic ambition without enough solid foundation to build a project. The way they do is based on conflict, classism and contempt for others. In the end however, the results are mediocre and the cost dramatically.
are many aspects that differentiate the spirit of both teams is to make the game becomes philosophy, relationships, life in a nutshell. When you present the dilemmas involving the two philosophies, it seems impossible that anyone can opt for the latter, unless for incompetence, craving for power or money.
not, as some may prefer al'honestedat foul play, the conflict harmony, the
pride to humility, the team hierarchy, or rejection of the same admiration of others.
The analogy we make between the football world and the company, there is a difference between the two and that soccer is done every year clean slate and start from scratch, while the company begins each year where he finished last year.
the direction we believe that we all depend are part of a great team, which is exhibited as an example and envy of others, or we enter a downward spiral in which the disaffection empire and escape from "normal" people, finally playing in minor leagues.
Waters is more than a club?
0 comments:
Post a Comment